For a global ETF portfolio bought through IBKR, some investors hold IWDA (developed markets) and EIMI (emerging markets) separately, plus a Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF, rather than one all-world fund like an MSCI ACWI or FTSE All-World ETF. What's the reasoning?
1 Answers
Yes, there is a deliberate tilt towards the Nasdaq 100. It has given wonderful returns to me in the past (by MON100). In future, also, with all AI companies in it, I am bullish on this.
Frankly, I always try to choose a larger one (more AUM) for liquidity. I may be wrong here.
Splitting IWDA & EIMI is deliberate to keep the emerging market separate. IMHO, MSCI ACWI does not do justice to emerging markets.
Happy to learn from others.
Related
What can I submit as "documentary evidence for the purpose of investment" when sending money to IBKR from AU Bank?
1 answers
Why was my AU Bank outward remittance converted at a worse rate than the live rate on Google?
1 answers
Is Wise cheaper than a bank for sending money to an overseas brokerage account?
1 answers
Do I need a premium or high-balance account with AU Bank to get the zero forex markup?
1 answers
Does AU Bank need the IBKR confirmation letter and a 1-year bank statement for every remittance?
1 answers
Which documents does AU Bank ask for at the branch for an LRS remittance to a foreign broker?
1 answers